— James D. Ford GAICD | Principal Solicitor, Blue Ocean Law Group℠.
Thanks to Suk Jae Chung | Virtual Intern, Blue Ocean Law Group℠ for his assistance with the intro + Summary of the current Australian legislative response.
On the surface, remote AVL witnessing might appear to be a modern, convenient + temporarily (due to COVID-19) “government-approved” legally reliable solution which also represents an opportunity for better customer service.
If remote (AVL) has only been made legal now as an emergency COVID-19 response by some Australian jurisdictions:
1️⃣ Why have some, and not all jurisdictions legislated approval to use this method? and
2️⃣ Why is the change temporary, not permanent?
There are fundamental reasons (refer discussion below) for Australian lawmakers not legislating to approve remote (AVL) witnessing.
In an abundance of caution, we provide the following warning:
“Witnessing a Will or any important/high-value legal documents via remote AVL should only be used as a last resort.”
We recommend before you consider remote AVL witnessing, you ask whether there are any practical alternatives such as the following:
➲ “Window-signing” involves witnessing the signature is from the safety of the other side of a full-height “floor to ceiling” glass door/panel/window, or car window where it is plain to the witness or witnesses that there is no other person in or near the vehicle.
➲ Can the witnessing be delayed until after the immediate COVID-19 threat has subsided? Then proceed with all appropriate COVID-19 safety precautions.
Remote AVL witnessing has the potential to create more problems than it solves!
As just one example, a family member or trusted carer could use remote AVL witnessing as an enabling technology to perpetrate Elder abuse.
“Elder abuse is a real + growing issue.
More than one million Australians are forecast to have dementia by 2056. 
Stealing from a stranger has criminal consequences.
When a family member or trusted carer obtains a personal financial benefit by pressuring ^ an elderly person into signing a Will or other legal document such as an Enduring Power of Attorney it is not currently a chargeable criminal offence.”
— James D. Ford | Principal Solicitor, Blue Ocean Law Group℠
“In certain situations we do not recommend the use of remote AVL witnessing, even as a last resort!”
➲ The witness does not know the person signing or the person proving instructions;
➲ The person signing is not providing the instructions;
➲ There is an unexplained or unconvincing requirement for urgency. There is no pending transaction or medical/health issue, Etc.;
➲ The person signing used to have a lawyer (but now does not);
➲ There will be a significant change in the status quo without adequate explanation; or
➲ There is a hint of a possibility of lack of legal capacity*, duress^ or undue influence**.
* According to the NSW Capacity Toolkit: Legal capacity has four parts:
1️⃣ A person who has capacity is able to make decisions about things that affect their daily life, such as: where to live, what to buy, what support or services they need, when to go to the doctor, and matters that have legal consequences (which require legal capacity), including: making a Will, getting married, entering into a contract, having medical treatment.
“Broadly speaking, when a person has capacity to make a particular decision, they are able to do all of the following:
2️⃣ Capacity is decision specific. The level of capacity required for each decision needs to be assessed each time a decision is made.
3️⃣ What can affect a person's capacity?
Capacity varies from person to person and from situation to situation. Capacity is not something solid that you can hold and measure. Neither is it something that is the same all the time. It is affected by a person's abilities and by what's happening around them.
4️⃣ Capacity can be regained.
A person can regain capacity or increase their capacity. For example, they can regain consciousness or learn new skills that will enable them to make certain decisions for themselves.
To learn more about decision-making + capacity within NSW (the principles learned would have Australia-wide relevance) here is a link to an (approx. 30 minute) interactive E-learning online course provided by the NSW Government.
^ Duress is wrongful pressure exerted upon a person to coerce that person into signing a document/contract that he or she ordinarily wouldn’t sign.
** Undue Influence is an act of controlling another person, due to a dominant position or relationship.
An overly helpful relative or support person is providing all of the instructions regarding the Will or other key document. There is an urgent change (where there is no apparent reason for urgency) whereby the person instructing will personally benefit as a result or gain control over the estate or ongoing affairs of the person signing (representing a conflict of interest). If you are requested to be a witness
in such a scenario, we recommend that you look for any sign of textbook or other red flags + raise questions regarding the person’s mental capacity and the potential for duress or undue influence.
What could be happening “Off-Screen”?
Whilst a witness can see the face of the person signing, it is challenging to see everything.
The example typically provided is that:
“Somebody could point a gun at the person signing from off-screen, and the remote witness would not be aware of this as their vision is limited to the screen captured by the camera”.
It could also be hard for the witness to form an impression of what is happening or being said in the background at the remote location due to actual/accidental/deliberate technical issues causing muting of the audio or making it difficult to hear the audio/voice.
In light of NSW’s recent extension of remote witnessing provisions by Audio-Visual Link (AVL) to 31 December 2021, here is a summary of the responses of the majority of Australian States + Territories.
In addition, the NSW Law Society has recently published a guide called “Implications of the electronic witnessing provisions”, and a related FAQs document.
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
✅ Permits AVL -> split execution is expressly permitted.
A company may also execute a document (including an electronic document) under section 127(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) if each company signatory either:
➲ Signs a copy or counterpart of the document in physical form; or
➲ Uses electronic communication which reliably identifies the person and indicates their intention about the contents of the document;
➲ The physical or electronic communication must include the entire contents of the document but does not need to have the physical or electronic signature of another person;
➲ The assumptions in section 129(5) of the Corporations Act apply to a document signed following this modified method.
⌛️ Temporary measures are applying from 6 May 2020 to 21 March 2021 (inclusive).
✅ Permits AVL
⌛️ Temporary measure expires three months after the end of the COVID-19 State of Emergency
(COVID-19 Witnessing of Documents) Regulation 2020 under s. 14G Electronic Transactions Act 2000
✅ Permits AVL
⌛️ Temporary measure expires 31 December 2021.
❌ No temporary measure.
s. 7 Justice Legislation (COVID-19 Emergency Response - Wills and Enduring Documents) Regulation 2020
✅ Permits AVL
⌛️ Temporary measure expires 31 December 2020.
❌ No temporary AVL measure.
✅ Not strictly concerning attestation of Wills, but an extension of the classes of persons who may witness statutory declarations.
Notice under s. 17 of COVID-19 Disease Emergency (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2020
✅ Permits AVL
⌛️ Temporary measure expires 17 June 2021 or 60 days after the end of the COVID-19 Emergency.
✅ Permits AVL
⌛️ Temporary measure valid until revoked.
❌ No temporary measure.
If you need more detailed information regarding the Australian COVID-19 legislative response regarding the execution of documents we recommend you refer to this Practical Law Guide.